University of Denver
In This Section
Advancing empirically informed models to promote greater accessibility, efficiency, and accountability in civil justice
Rule One Initiative, Changes In Place, Oregon,
Implementation, Case Management, Discovery Generally, Early Information
Exchange, Expedited Trial, Experts, State
Oregon Expedited Civil Jury Trial Program
On May 6, 2010, Oregon Supreme Court Chief Justice Paul J. De Muniz
signed an order implementing an expedited civil jury trial program in
selected Oregon Circuit Courts. The goal of this program is to provide
speedy and economical disposition of civil cases and to increase the
use of jury trials to decide civil cases.
Multnomah County is now offering this expedited track for civil jury trials. Parties may opt in to this track. The process includes an initial case management conference with trial counsel no later than 10 days after the case is designated as appropriate for this track. At the initial conference the court will set a firm trial date which will be no later than four months from the date of the designation order.
Oregon offers the following resources:
Multnomah County is now offering this expedited track for civil jury trials. Parties may opt in to this track. The process includes an initial case management conference with trial counsel no later than 10 days after the case is designated as appropriate for this track. At the initial conference the court will set a firm trial date which will be no later than four months from the date of the designation order.
Oregon offers the following resources:
From the Blog
- New Lawyers Getting Much Needed Experience through Volunteer Legal Services
- New Study Examines Overlooked Process for Selecting Key Federal Judges
- Justice Patricio M. Serna Honored as Santa Fe Living Treasure
- Minnesota Judge Joins Ohio Chief Justice in Calling for Selection Reform
- New Report on Outside Spending in 2012-13 Supreme Court Races
- In Pennsylvania, Governor Nominates a New Justice while Another Sitting Justice Faces a Criminal Investigation
- Core Competencies for Entry-Level Lawyers? Send Us Yours
- Honoring Families Initiative Welcomes New Director
On Twitter
- Core Competencies for Entry-Level Lawyers? Send Us Yours http://t.co/lZR8JqpGxy
- Honoring Families Initiative Welcomes New Director http://t.co/P6cLWgk4iU
- Introducing Katherine Kirk… http://t.co/8q9wSwWejj
- Oklahoma Legislature to Study Judicial Term Limits http://t.co/zFmovWdzo8
- More Nominating Commission Controversy in Tennessee http://t.co/BA7QICIJeS
University of Denver Sturm College of Law
Faculty & Staff Directory, In this Section
 |
Martin J. Katz Email: mkatz(at)law.du.edu Phone: 303.871.6301, Office: 215C, Classes: Anti-Discrimination Law, Constitutional Law, Employment Law, SSRN: View Now » CV: View Now » |
Faculty Profile: Dean; Constitutional Law; Workplace Law; Employment and Labor Law; B.A., 1987, Harvard College; J.D., 1991, Yale Law School
Marty Katz specializes in antidiscrimination law, both within
constitutional law and employment law. His work on antidiscrimination
law has been published in the Georgetown Law Journal, the Notre Dame Law
Review, the Indiana Law Journal, the Hastings Law Journal, and the Yale
Law Journal. His work on separation of powers has been published in
Constitutional Commentary, a peer-reviewed journal. He has lectured
extensively on antidiscrimination law, free speech and religion,
separation of powers, defamation, and employment-related intellectual
property law. He also has made numerous media appearances. Prior to
teaching full time, Katz was a partner in the employment law group at
Davis, Graham & Stubbs, and a law clerk to David M. Ebel on the U.S.
Court of Appeals. In his spare time, he flies search and rescue
missions for the Civil Air Patrol.
View More »
Featured Publications
- Facilitating Better Law Teaching – Now, 62 EMORY L.J. 823 (2013).
- Analyzing Carnegie's Reach: The Contingent Nature of Innovation, co-authored with Stephen Daniels and William M. Sullivan, The Journal of Legal Education, forthcoming.
- Hoisted by their Own Petard: Struve Applies Pretext Analysis to the Court, Finds Justices’ Motives Questionable, http://worklaw.jotwell.com/ (January 21, 2011).
- Gross Disunity, 114 PENN. ST. L. REV. 857 (2010).
- Boumediene, Guantanamo and Jurisdiction Stripping: The Imperial President Meets the Imperial Court, 25 Constitutional Commentary 377(2009) (peer reviewed).
No comments:
Post a Comment